↓ Skip to main content

The Plant Cell Wall: A Dynamic Barrier Against Pathogen Invasion

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
540 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Plant Cell Wall: A Dynamic Barrier Against Pathogen Invasion
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2012.00085
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Underwood

Abstract

Prospective plant pathogens must overcome the physical barrier presented by the plant cell wall. In addition to being a preformed, passive barrier limiting access of pathogens to plant cells, the cell wall is actively remodeled and reinforced specifically at discrete sites of interaction with potentially pathogenic microbes. Active reinforcement of the cell wall through the deposition of cell wall appositions, referred to as papillae, is an early response to perception of numerous categories of pathogens including fungi and bacteria. Rapid deposition of papillae is generally correlated with resistance to fungal pathogens that attempt to penetrate plant cell walls for the establishment of feeding structures. Despite the ubiquity and apparent importance of this early defense response, relatively little is known about the underlying molecular mechanisms and cellular processes involved in the targeting and assembly of papillae. This review summarizes recent advances in our understanding of cell wall-associated defenses induced by pathogen perception as well as the impact of changes in cell wall polymers on interactions with pathogens and highlights significant unanswered questions driving future research in the area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 540 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 527 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 123 23%
Student > Master 77 14%
Student > Bachelor 62 11%
Researcher 60 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 7%
Other 76 14%
Unknown 103 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 276 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 15%
Unspecified 23 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 1%
Environmental Science 8 1%
Other 28 5%
Unknown 116 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,881,920
of 24,495,755 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,335
of 23,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,263
of 252,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.