↓ Skip to main content

Cotton fiber: a powerful single-cell model for cell wall and cellulose research

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cotton fiber: a powerful single-cell model for cell wall and cellulose research
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2012.00104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Candace H. Haigler, Lissete Betancur, Michael R. Stiff, John R. Tuttle

Abstract

Cotton fibers are single-celled extensions of the seed epidermis. They can be isolated in pure form as they undergo staged differentiation including primary cell wall synthesis during elongation and nearly pure cellulose synthesis during secondary wall thickening. This combination of features supports clear interpretation of data about cell walls and cellulose synthesis in the context of high throughput modern experimental technologies. Prior contributions of cotton fiber to building fundamental knowledge about cell walls will be summarized and the dynamic changes in cell wall polymers throughout cotton fiber differentiation will be described. Recent successes in using stable cotton transformation to alter cotton fiber cell wall properties as well as cotton fiber quality will be discussed. Futurec prospects to perform experiments more rapidly through altering cotton fiberwall properties via virus-induced gene silencing will be evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 19%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 42 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Chemistry 14 8%
Engineering 10 6%
Materials Science 10 6%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,585,630
of 23,390,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,827
of 21,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,462
of 247,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#45
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,390,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.