↓ Skip to main content

Unleashing the Genome of Brassica Rapa

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unleashing the Genome of Brassica Rapa
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2012.00172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haibao Tang, Eric Lyons

Abstract

The completion and release of the Brassica rapa genome is of great benefit to researchers of the Brassicas, Arabidopsis, and genome evolution. While its lineage is closely related to the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana, the Brassicas experienced a whole genome triplication subsequent to their divergence. This event contemporaneously created three copies of its ancestral genome, which had diploidized through the process of homeologous gene loss known as fractionation. By the fractionation of homeologous gene content and genetic regulatory binding sites, Brassica's genome is well placed to use comparative genomic techniques to identify syntenic regions, homeologous gene duplications, and putative regulatory sequences. Here, we use the comparative genomics platform CoGe to perform several different genomic analyses with which to study structural changes of its genome and dynamics of various genetic elements. Starting with whole genome comparisons, the Brassica paleohexaploidy is characterized, syntenic regions with A. thaliana are identified, and the TOC1 gene in the circadian rhythm pathway from A. thaliana is used to find duplicated orthologs in B. rapa. These TOC1 genes are further analyzed to identify conserved non-coding sequences that contain cis-acting regulatory elements and promoter sequences previously implicated in circadian rhythmicity. Each "cookbook style" analysis includes a step-by-step walk-through with links to CoGe to quickly reproduce each step of the analytical process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2012.
All research outputs
#6,339,992
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,190
of 24,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,897
of 247,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#27
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,514 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.