↓ Skip to main content

Plasticity of plasma membrane compartmentalization during plant immune responses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasticity of plasma membrane compartmentalization during plant immune responses
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2012.00181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan L. Urbanus, Thomas Ott

Abstract

Plasma membranes require high levels of plasticity to modulate the perception and transduction of extracellular and intracellular signals. Dynamic lateral assembly of protein complexes combined with an independent compositional lipid patterning in both membrane leaflets provide cells the opportunity to decorate this interface with specific proteins in an organized but dynamic manner. Such ability to dynamically reorganize the protein content of the plasma membrane is essential for the regulation of processes such as polarity of transport, development, and microbial infection. While the plant cell wall represents the first physical and mostly unspecific barrier for invading microbes, the plasma membrane is at the forefront of microbial recognition and initiation of defense responses. Accumulating evidence indicating dynamic compartmentalization of plasma membranes in response to environmental cues has increased the interest in the compositional heterogeneity of this bilayer. Here, we elucidate the recruitment of specific proteins into defined membrane structures that ensure functional compartmentalization of the bilayer during infection processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2012.
All research outputs
#17,664,478
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,798
of 19,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,318
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#84
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,848 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.