↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Inorganic Nitrogen form and CO2 Concentration on Wheat Yield and Nutrient Accumulation and Distribution

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effects of Inorganic Nitrogen form and CO2 Concentration on Wheat Yield and Nutrient Accumulation and Distribution
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2012.00195
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eli Carlisle, Samuel Myers, Victor Raboy, Arnold Bloom

Abstract

Inorganic N is available to plants from the soil as ammonium [Formula: see text] and nitrate [Formula: see text]. We studied how wheat grown hydroponically to senescence in controlled environmental chambers is affected by N form ([Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text]) and CO(2) concentration ("subambient," "ambient," and "elevated") in terms of biomass, yield, and nutrient accumulation and partitioning. Wheat supplied with [Formula: see text] as a sole N source had the strongest response to CO(2) concentration. Plants exposed to subambient and ambient CO(2) concentrations typically had the greatest biomass and nutrient accumulation under both N forms. In general [Formula: see text]-supplied plants had higher concentrations of total N, P, K, S, Ca, Zn, Fe, and Cu, while [Formula: see text]-supplied plants had higher concentrations of Mg, B, Mn, and [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]-supplied plants contained amounts of phytate similar to [Formula: see text]-supplied plants but had higher bioavailable Zn, which could have consequences for human health. [Formula: see text]-supplied plants allocated more nutrients and biomass to aboveground tissues whereas [Formula: see text]-supplied plants allocated more nutrients to the roots. The two inorganic nitrogen forms influenced plant growth and nutrient status so distinctly that they should be treated as separate nutrients. Moreover, plant growth and nutrient status varied in a non-linear manner with atmospheric CO(2) concentration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Researcher 12 13%
Other 11 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 56%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,750
of 19,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,176
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#109
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,848 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.