↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in O-glycan engineering of plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges in O-glycan engineering of plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2012.00218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Strasser

Abstract

Plants are attractive alternative expression hosts for the production of recombinant proteins. Many therapeutic proteins are glycosylated with N- and O-glycosylation being the most prevalent forms of protein glycosylation. While N-glycans have already been modified in plants toward the formation of homogenous mammalian-type glycoforms with equal or improved biological function compared to mammalian-cell culture produced glycoproteins little attention has been paid to the modification of O-linked glycans. Recently, the first step of mammalian O-glycan biosynthesis has been accomplished in plants. However, as outlined in this short review there are important issues that have to be addressed in the future. These include: (i) elimination of potentially immunogenic or allergenic carbohydrate epitopes containing arabinosides or arabinogalactans, (ii) a detailed investigation of the interplay between engineered N- and O-glycosylation pathways to avoid competition for common metabolites like UDP-GlcNAc, and (iii) a deeper understanding of signals and mechanisms for distribution of glycan processing enzymes, which is a prerequisite for complete and homogenous glycosylation of recombinant proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 26%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Chemistry 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,166,700
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,754
of 19,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,187
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#109
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,852 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.