↓ Skip to main content

Mathematical modeling of an oscillating gene circuit to unravel the circadian clock network of Arabidopsis thaliana

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mathematical modeling of an oscillating gene circuit to unravel the circadian clock network of Arabidopsis thaliana
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nora Bujdoso, Seth J. Davis

Abstract

The Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock is an interconnected network highly tractable to systems approaches. Most elements in the transcriptional-translational oscillator were identified by genetic means and the expression of clock genes in various mutants led to the founding hypothesis of a positive-negative feedback loop being the core clock. The identification of additional clock genes beyond those defined in the core led to the use of systems approaches to decipher this angiosperm oscillator circuit. Kinetic modeling was first used to explain periodicity effects of various circadian mutants. This conformed in a flexible way to experimental details. Such observations allowed a recursive use of hypothesis generating from modeling, followed by experimental corroboration. More recently, the biochemical finding of new description of a DNA-binding activity for one class of clock components directed improvements in feature generation, one of which revealed that the core of the oscillator is a negative-negative feedback loop. The recursive use of modeling and experimental validation has thus revealed many essential transcriptional components that drive negative arms in the circadian oscillator. What awaits is to more fully describe the positive arms and an understanding of how additional pathways converge on the clock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Engineering 6 7%
Mathematics 5 6%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2013.
All research outputs
#13,880,538
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,183
of 19,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,311
of 280,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#113
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,898 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.