↓ Skip to main content

How to quantify conduits in wood?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to quantify conduits in wood?
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Scholz, Matthias Klepsch, Zohreh Karimi, Steven Jansen

Abstract

Vessels and tracheids represent the most important xylem cells with respect to long distance water transport in plants. Wood anatomical studies frequently provide several quantitative details of these cells, such as vessel diameter, vessel density, vessel element length, and tracheid length, while important information on the three dimensional structure of the hydraulic network is not considered. This paper aims to provide an overview of various techniques, although there is no standard protocol to quantify conduits due to high anatomical variation and a wide range of techniques available. Despite recent progress in image analysis programs and automated methods for measuring cell dimensions, density, and spatial distribution, various characters remain time-consuming and tedious. Quantification of vessels and tracheids is not only important to better understand functional adaptations of tracheary elements to environment parameters, but will also be essential for linking wood anatomy with other fields such as wood development, xylem physiology, palaeobotany, and dendrochronology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 394 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 21%
Researcher 67 16%
Student > Master 63 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 8%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Other 52 13%
Unknown 80 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 45%
Environmental Science 86 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Materials Science 8 2%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 95 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,185,720
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,815
of 19,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,721
of 280,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#241
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,916 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.