↓ Skip to main content

Roles of pectin in biomass yield and processing for biofuels

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Roles of pectin in biomass yield and processing for biofuels
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chaowen Xiao, Charles T. Anderson

Abstract

Pectin is a component of the cell walls of plants that is composed of acidic sugar-containing backbones with neutral sugar-containing side chains. It functions in cell adhesion and wall hydration, and pectin crosslinking influences wall porosity and plant morphogenesis. Despite its low abundance in the secondary cell walls that make up the majority of lignocellulosic biomass, recent results have indicated that pectin influences secondary wall formation in addition to its roles in primary wall biosynthesis and modification. This mini-review will examine these and other recent results in the context of biomass yield and digestibility and discuss how these traits might be enhanced by the genetic and molecular modification of pectin. The utility of pectin as a high-value, renewable biomass co-product will also be highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 299 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 18%
Student > Master 44 14%
Researcher 41 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 88 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 14%
Chemistry 15 5%
Engineering 12 4%
Chemical Engineering 12 4%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 102 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,182,179
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,416
of 19,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,246
of 280,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#68
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.