↓ Skip to main content

Underwater Photosynthesis of Submerged Plants – Recent Advances and Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Underwater Photosynthesis of Submerged Plants – Recent Advances and Methods
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ole Pedersen, Timothy D. Colmer, Kaj Sand-Jensen

Abstract

We describe the general background and the recent advances in research on underwater photosynthesis of leaf segments, whole communities, and plant dominated aquatic ecosystems and present contemporary methods tailor made to quantify photosynthesis and carbon fixation under water. The majority of studies of aquatic photosynthesis have been carried out with detached leaves or thalli and this selectiveness influences the perception of the regulation of aquatic photosynthesis. We thus recommend assessing the influence of inorganic carbon and temperature on natural aquatic communities of variable density in addition to studying detached leaves in the scenarios of rising CO2 and temperature. Moreover, a growing number of researchers are interested in tolerance of terrestrial plants during flooding as torrential rains sometimes result in overland floods that inundate terrestrial plants. We propose to undertake studies to elucidate the importance of leaf acclimation of terrestrial plants to facilitate gas exchange and light utilization under water as these acclimations influence underwater photosynthesis as well as internal aeration of plant tissues during submergence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 426 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 19%
Student > Bachelor 80 19%
Student > Master 63 15%
Researcher 46 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 87 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 29%
Environmental Science 84 19%
Engineering 26 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 5%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 107 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,796,660
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,899
of 21,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,401
of 284,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#39
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,663 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.