You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2013.00165 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter A. H. M. Bakker, Roeland L. Berendsen, Rogier F. Doornbos, Paul C. A. Wintermans, Corné M. J. Pieterse |
| Abstract |
The rhizosphere was defined over 100 years ago as the zone around the root where microorganisms and processes important for plant growth and health are located. Recent studies show that the diversity of microorganisms associated with the root system is enormous. This rhizosphere microbiome extends the functional repertoire of the plant beyond imagination. The rhizosphere microbiome of Arabidopsis thaliana is currently being studied for the obvious reason that it allows the use of the extensive toolbox that comes with this model plant. Deciphering plant traits that drive selection and activities of the microbiome is now a major challenge in which Arabidopsis will undoubtedly be a major research object. Here we review recent microbiome studies and discuss future research directions and applicability of the generated knowledge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Peru | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Norway | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 819 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | <1% |
| Unknown | 793 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 174 | 21% |
| Researcher | 136 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 126 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 57 | 7% |
| Other | 88 | 11% |
| Unknown | 155 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 421 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 90 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 53 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 3% |
| Engineering | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 4% |
| Unknown | 188 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,667,867
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,244
of 19,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,297
of 280,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#27
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,948 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.