You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular regulation of fruit ripening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2013.00198 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia Osorio, Federico Scossa, Alisdair R. Fernie |
| Abstract |
Fruit ripening is a highly coordinated developmental process that coincides with seed maturation. The ripening process is regulated by thousands of genes that control progressive softening and/or lignification of pericarp layers, accumulation of sugars, acids, pigments, and release of volatiles. Key to crop improvement is a deeper understanding of the processes underlying fruit ripening. In tomato, mutations blocking the transition to ripe fruits have provided insights into the role of ethylene and its associated molecular networks involved in the control of ripening. However, the role of other plant hormones is still poorly understood. In this review, we describe how plant hormones, transcription factors, and epigenetic changes are intimately related to provide a tight control of the ripening process. Recent findings from comparative genomics and system biology approaches are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Greece | 2 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 298 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
| Researcher | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 174 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 73 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,765,566
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,904
of 20,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,420
of 283,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#39
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.