↓ Skip to main content

A re-sequencing based assessment of genomic heterogeneity and fast neutron-induced deletions in a common bean cultivar

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A re-sequencing based assessment of genomic heterogeneity and fast neutron-induced deletions in a common bean cultivar
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamie A. O'Rourke, Luis P. Iniguez, Bruna Bucciarelli, Jeffrey Roessler, Jeremy Schmutz, Phillip E. McClean, Scott A. Jackson, Georgina Hernandez, Michelle A. Graham, Robert M. Stupar, Carroll P. Vance

Abstract

A small fast neutron (FN) mutant population has been established from Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Red Hawk. We leveraged the available P. vulgaris genome sequence and high throughput next generation DNA sequencing to examine the genomic structure of five P. vulgaris cv. Red Hawk FN mutants with striking visual phenotypes. Analysis of these genomes identified three classes of structural variation (SV); between cultivar variation, natural variation within the FN mutant population, and FN induced mutagenesis. Our analyses focused on the latter two classes. We identified 23 large deletions (>40 bp) common to multiple individuals, illustrating residual heterogeneity and regions of SV within the common bean cv. Red Hawk. An additional 18 large deletions were identified in individual mutant plants. These deletions, ranging in size from 40 bp to 43,000 bp, are potentially the result of FN mutagenesis. Six of the 18 deletions lie near or within gene coding regions, identifying potential candidate genes causing the mutant phenotype.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 71%
Computer Science 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,690,153
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,853
of 19,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,183
of 280,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#172
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.