↓ Skip to main content

Disentangling who is who during rhizosphere acidification in root interactions: combining fluorescence with optode techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disentangling who is who during rhizosphere acidification in root interactions: combining fluorescence with optode techniques
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00392
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Faget, Stephan Blossfeld, Philipp von Gillhaussen, Ulrich Schurr, Vicky M. Temperton

Abstract

Plant-soil interactions can strongly influence root growth in plants. There is now increasing evidence that root-root interactions can also influence root growth, affecting architecture and root traits such as lateral root formation. Both when species grow alone or in interaction with others, root systems are in turn affected by as well as affect rhizosphere pH. Changes in soil pH have knock-on effects on nutrient availability. A limitation until recently has been the inability to assign species identity to different roots in soil. Combining the planar optode technique with fluorescent plants enables us to distinguish between plant species grown in natural soil and in parallel study pH dynamics in a non-invasive way at the same region of interest (ROI). We measured pH in the rhizosphere of maize and bean in rhizotrons in a climate chamber, with ROIs on roots in proximity to the roots of the other species as well as not-close to the other species. We found clear dynamic changes of pH over time and differences between the two species in rhizosphere acidification. Interestingly, when roots of the two species were interacting, the degree of acidification or alkalization compared to bulk soil was less strong then when roots were not growing in the vicinity of the other species. This cutting-edge approach can help provide a better understanding of plant-plant and plant-soil interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 48%
Environmental Science 16 16%
Engineering 6 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,205,224
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,880
of 19,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,301
of 209,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,977 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them