You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Empirical and process-based approaches to climate-induced forest mortality models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2013.00438 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henry D. Adams, A. Park Williams, Chonggang Xu, Sara A. Rauscher, Xiaoyan Jiang, Nate G. McDowell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 25% |
| Researcher | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Engineering | 13 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 52 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,388,323
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,351
of 24,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,906
of 289,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#70
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.