↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of water, salinity, and cold stress responses by salicylic acid

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
621 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulation of water, salinity, and cold stress responses by salicylic acid
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenji Miura, Yasuomi Tada

Abstract

Salicylic acid (SA) is a naturally occurring phenolic compound. SA plays an important role in the regulation of plant growth, development, ripening, and defense responses. The role of SA in the plant-pathogen relationship has been extensively investigated. In addition to defense responses, SA plays an important role in the response to abiotic stresses, including drought, low temperature, and salinity stresses. It has been suggested that SA has great agronomic potential to improve the stress tolerance of agriculturally important crops. However, the utility of SA is dependent on the concentration of the applied SA, the mode of application, and the state of the plants (e.g., developmental stage and acclimation). Generally, low concentrations of applied SA alleviate the sensitivity to abiotic stresses, and high concentrations of applied induce high levels of oxidative stress, leading to a decreased tolerance to abiotic stresses. In this article, the effects of SA on the water stress responses and regulation of stomatal closure are reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Unknown 488 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 23%
Student > Master 67 14%
Researcher 56 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 7%
Student > Bachelor 32 6%
Other 75 15%
Unknown 116 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 262 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 12%
Environmental Science 14 3%
Unspecified 5 1%
Engineering 4 <1%
Other 15 3%
Unknown 135 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,737,646
of 25,367,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,549
of 24,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,453
of 319,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,367,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.