↓ Skip to main content

Systems analysis of transcriptome data provides new hypotheses about Arabidopsis root response to nitrate treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systems analysis of transcriptome data provides new hypotheses about Arabidopsis root response to nitrate treatments
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Canales, Tomás C. Moyano, Eva Villarroel, Rodrigo A. Gutiérrez

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient for plant growth and development. Plants adapt to changes in N availability partly by changes in global gene expression. We integrated publicly available root microarray data under contrasting nitrate conditions to identify new genes and functions important for adaptive nitrate responses in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Overall, more than 2000 genes exhibited changes in expression in response to nitrate treatments in Arabidopsis thaliana root organs. Global regulation of gene expression by nitrate depends largely on the experimental context. However, despite significant differences from experiment to experiment in the identity of regulated genes, there is a robust nitrate response of specific biological functions. Integrative gene network analysis uncovered relationships between nitrate-responsive genes and 11 highly co-expressed gene clusters (modules). Four of these gene network modules have robust nitrate responsive functions such as transport, signaling, and metabolism. Network analysis hypothesized G2-like transcription factors are key regulatory factors controlling transport and signaling functions. Our meta-analysis highlights the role of biological processes not studied before in the context of the nitrate response such as root hair development and provides testable hypothesis to advance our understanding of nitrate responses in plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Chile 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 163 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 25%
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 16%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 28 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,440,014
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,797
of 20,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,882
of 305,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.