↓ Skip to main content

Physiological and molecular implications of plant polyamine metabolism during biotic interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological and molecular implications of plant polyamine metabolism during biotic interactions
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00095
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan F. Jiménez-Bremont, María Marina, María de la Luz Guerrero-González, Franco R. Rossi, Diana Sánchez-Rangel, Margarita Rodríguez-Kessler, Oscar A. Ruiz, Andrés Gárriz

Abstract

During ontogeny, plants interact with a wide variety of microorganisms. The association with mutualistic microbes results in benefits for the plant. By contrast, pathogens may cause a remarkable impairment of plant growth and development. Both types of plant-microbe interactions provoke notable changes in the polyamine (PA) metabolism of the host and/or the microbe, being each interaction a complex and dynamic process. It has been well documented that the levels of free and conjugated PAs undergo profound changes in plant tissues during the interaction with microorganisms. In general, this is correlated with a precise and coordinated regulation of PA biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes. Interestingly, some evidence suggests that the relative importance of these metabolic pathways may depend on the nature of the microorganism, a concept that stems from the fact that these amines mediate the activation of plant defense mechanisms. This effect is mediated mostly through PA oxidation, even though part of the response is activated by non-oxidized PAs. In the last years, a great deal of effort has been devoted to profile plant gene expression following microorganism recognition. In addition, the phenotypes of transgenic and mutant plants in PA metabolism genes have been assessed. In this review, we integrate the current knowledge on this field and analyze the possible roles of these amines during the interaction of plants with microbes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 20%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 16%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 37 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,224,618
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,942
of 20,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,830
of 242,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#40
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.