↓ Skip to main content

The role of ubiquitin and the 26S proteasome in plant abiotic stress signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of ubiquitin and the 26S proteasome in plant abiotic stress signaling
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophia L. Stone

Abstract

Ubiquitin is a small, highly conserved, ubiquitously expressed eukaryotic protein with immensely important and diverse regulatory functions. A well-studied function of ubiquitin is its role in selective proteolysis by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). The UPS has emerged as an integral player in plant response and adaptation to environmental stresses such as drought, salinity, cold and nutrient deprivation. The UPS has also been shown to influence the production and signal transduction of stress-related hormones such as abscisic acid. Understanding UPS function has centered mainly on defining the role of E3 ubiquitin ligases, which are the substrate-recruiting component of the ubiquitination pathway. The recent identification of stress signaling/regulatory proteins that are the subject of ubiquitin-dependent degradation has increased our knowledge of how the UPS facilitates responses to adverse environmental conditions. A brief overview is provided on role of the UPS in modulating protein stability during abiotic stress signaling. E3 ubiquitin ligases for which stress-related substrate proteins have been identified are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 201 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 26%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 20%
Environmental Science 2 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 42 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,097
of 24,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,502
of 239,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#27
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.