↓ Skip to main content

The FLC-like gene BvFL1 is not a major regulator of vernalization response in biennial beets

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The FLC-like gene BvFL1 is not a major regulator of vernalization response in biennial beets
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian H. Vogt, Guy Weyens, Marc Lefèbvre, Bettina Bork, Axel Schechert, Andreas E. Müller

Abstract

Many plant species in temperate climate regions require vernalization over winter to initiate flowering. Flowering Locus C (FLC) and FLC-like genes are key regulators of vernalization requirement and growth habit in winter-annual and perennial Brassicaceae. In the biennial crop species Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris in the evolutionarily distant Caryophyllales clade of core eudicots growth habit and bolting time are controlled by the vernalization and photoperiod response gene BTC1 and the downstream BvFT1-BvFT2 module. B. vulgaris also contains a vernalization-responsive FLC homolog (BvFL1). Here, to further elucidate the regulation of vernalization response and growth habit in beet, we functionally characterized BvFL1 by RNAi and over-expression in transgenic plants. BvFL1 RNAi neither eliminated the requirement for vernalization of biennial beets nor had a major effect on bolting time after vernalization. Over-expression of BvFL1 resulted in a moderate late-bolting phenotype, with bolting after vernalization being delayed by approximately 1 week. By contrast, RNAi-induced down-regulation of the BvFT1-BvFT2 module led to a strong delay in bolting after vernalization by several weeks. The data demonstrate for the first time that an FLC homolog does not play a major role in the control of vernalization response in a dicot species outside the Brassicaceae.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 55 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 24%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#19,712
of 24,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,975
of 240,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#76
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.