↓ Skip to main content

bZIPs and WRKYs: two large transcription factor families executing two different functional strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
bZIPs and WRKYs: two large transcription factor families executing two different functional strategies
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carles M. Llorca, Maren Potschin, Ulrike Zentgraf

Abstract

bZIPs and WRKYs are two important plant transcription factor (TF) families regulating diverse developmental and stress-related processes. Since a partial overlap in these biological processes is obvious, it can be speculated that they fulfill non-redundant functions in a complex regulatory network. Here, we focus on the regulatory mechanisms that are so far described for bZIPs and WRKYs. bZIP factors need to heterodimerize for DNA-binding and regulation of transcription, and based on a bioinformatics approach, bZIPs can build up more than the double of protein interactions than WRKYs. In contrast, an enrichment of the WRKY DNA-binding motifs can be found in WRKY promoters, a phenomenon which is not observed for the bZIP family. Thus, the two TF families follow two different functional strategies in which WRKYs regulate each other's transcription in a transcriptional network whereas bZIP action relies on intensive heterodimerization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 208 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 31%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 21%
Chemistry 3 1%
Engineering 2 <1%
Neuroscience 2 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 35 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,228,822
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,956
of 20,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,159
of 227,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#84
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.