↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of regulation of SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 protein kinases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of regulation of SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 protein kinases
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Crozet, Leonor Margalha, Ana Confraria, Américo Rodrigues, Cláudia Martinho, Mattia Adamo, Carlos A. Elias, Elena Baena-González

Abstract

The SNF1 (sucrose non-fermenting 1)-related protein kinases 1 (SnRKs1) are the plant orthologs of the budding yeast SNF1 and mammalian AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase). These evolutionarily conserved kinases are metabolic sensors that undergo activation in response to declining energy levels. Upon activation, SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 kinases trigger a vast transcriptional and metabolic reprograming that restores energy homeostasis and promotes tolerance to adverse conditions, partly through an induction of catabolic processes and a general repression of anabolism. These kinases typically function as a heterotrimeric complex composed of two regulatory subunits, β and γ, and an α-catalytic subunit, which requires phosphorylation of a conserved activation loop residue for activity. Additionally, SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 kinases are controlled by multiple mechanisms that have an impact on kinase activity, stability, and/or subcellular localization. Here we will review current knowledge on the regulation of SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 by upstream components, post-translational modifications, various metabolites, hormones, and others, in an attempt to highlight both the commonalities of these essential eukaryotic kinases and the divergences that have evolved to cope with the particularities of each one of these systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 357 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 25%
Researcher 61 17%
Student > Bachelor 42 12%
Student > Master 38 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 74 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 163 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 23%
Chemistry 6 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 1%
Chemical Engineering 2 <1%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 85 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,392
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,956
of 20,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,910
of 226,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#94
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.