↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of plant microbe interactions in the era of next generation sequencing technologies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
599 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of plant microbe interactions in the era of next generation sequencing technologies
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Knief

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have impressively accelerated research in biological science during the last years by enabling the production of large volumes of sequence data to a drastically lower price per base, compared to traditional sequencing methods. The recent and ongoing developments in the field allow addressing research questions in plant-microbe biology that were not conceivable just a few years ago. The present review provides an overview of NGS technologies and their usefulness for the analysis of microorganisms that live in association with plants. Possible limitations of the different sequencing systems, in particular sources of errors and bias, are critically discussed and methods are disclosed that help to overcome these shortcomings. A focus will be on the application of NGS methods in metagenomic studies, including the analysis of microbial communities by amplicon sequencing, which can be considered as a targeted metagenomic approach. Different applications of NGS technologies are exemplified by selected research articles that address the biology of the plant associated microbiota to demonstrate the worth of the new methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 599 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Brazil 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 572 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 152 25%
Researcher 121 20%
Student > Master 87 15%
Student > Bachelor 49 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Other 81 14%
Unknown 73 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 314 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 91 15%
Environmental Science 31 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 2%
Computer Science 9 2%
Other 36 6%
Unknown 105 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2014.
All research outputs
#2,348,150
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,040
of 20,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,060
of 226,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.