↓ Skip to main content

What lies beyond the eye: the molecular mechanisms regulating tomato fruit weight and shape

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What lies beyond the eye: the molecular mechanisms regulating tomato fruit weight and shape
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther van der Knaap, Manohar Chakrabarti, Yi Hsuan Chu, Josh P. Clevenger, Eudald Illa-Berenguer, Zejun Huang, Neda Keyhaninejad, Qi Mu, Liang Sun, Yanping Wang, Shan Wu

Abstract

Domestication of fruit and vegetables resulted in a huge diversity of shapes and sizes of the produce. Selections that took place over thousands of years of alleles that increased fruit weight and altered shape for specific culinary uses provide a wealth of resources to study the molecular bases of this diversity. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) evolved from a wild ancestor (S. pimpinellifolium) bearing small and round edible fruit. Molecular genetic studies led to the identification of two genes selected for fruit weight: FW2.2 encoding a member of the Cell Number Regulator family; and FW3.2 encoding a P450 enzyme and the ortholog of KLUH. Four genes were identified that were selected for fruit shape: SUN encoding a member of the IQD family of calmodulin-binding proteins leading to fruit elongation; OVATE encoding a member of the OVATE family proteins involved in transcriptional repression leading to fruit elongation; LC encoding most likely the ortholog of WUSCHEL controlling meristem size and locule number; FAS encoding a member in the YABBY family controlling locule number leading to flat or oxheart shape. For this article, we will provide an overview of the putative function of the known genes, when during floral and fruit development they are hypothesized to act and their potential importance in regulating morphological diversity in other fruit and vegetable crops.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 208 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 18%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 12%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 54 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#13,915,695
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,223
of 20,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,083
of 226,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#47
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.