↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of the fruit endocarp: molecular mechanisms underlying adaptations in seed protection and dispersal strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of the fruit endocarp: molecular mechanisms underlying adaptations in seed protection and dispersal strategies
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Dardick, Ann M. Callahan

Abstract

Plant evolution is largely driven by adaptations in seed protection and dispersal strategies that allow diversification into new niches. This is evident by the tremendous variation in flowering and fruiting structures present both across and within different plant lineages. Within a single plant family a staggering variety of fruit types can be found such as fleshy fruits including berries, pomes, and drupes and dry fruit structures like achenes, capsules, and follicles. What are the evolutionary mechanisms that enable such dramatic shifts to occur in a relatively short period of time? This remains a fundamental question of plant biology today. On the surface it seems that these extreme differences in form and function must be the consequence of very different developmental programs that require unique sets of genes. Yet as we begin to decipher the molecular and genetic basis underlying fruit form it is becoming apparent that simple genetic changes in key developmental regulatory genes can have profound anatomical effects. In this review, we discuss recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms of fruit endocarp tissue differentiation that have contributed to species diversification within three plant lineages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 36 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 13%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Unspecified 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 40 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,940,770
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,147
of 20,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,554
of 227,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#21
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.