↓ Skip to main content

The potential for give and take in plant–microbiome relationships

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential for give and take in plant–microbiome relationships
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah L. Lebeis

Abstract

Mutualistic microbes present in plant-associate microbial communities provide a variety of benefits for their host, including reciprocal exchange of nutrients and/or protection from biotic and abiotic environmental stresses. Plant microbiomes have remarkably robust composition in comparison to the complex and dynamic microbial environments from which they form, suggesting finely tuned discrimination by the plant host. Here the intersection between the plant immune system and microbiomes will be explored, both as a possible means of shaping community membership and as a consequence elicited by certain colonizing microbes. Notably, the advent of massive parallel sequencing technologies allows the investigation of these beneficial microbial functions within whole community settings, so we can now ask how engagement of the immune response influences subsequent microbial interactions. Thus, we are currently poised for future work defining how the plant immune system impacts microbiomes and consequently host health, allowing us to better understand the potential of plant productivity optimization within complex microbial surroundings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 308 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 23%
Researcher 66 20%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 45 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 181 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 13%
Environmental Science 27 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 3%
Chemistry 3 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 52 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,811,523
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,351
of 20,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,351
of 228,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.