↓ Skip to main content

Sucrose and invertases, a part of the plant defense response to the biotic stresses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sucrose and invertases, a part of the plant defense response to the biotic stresses
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra S. Tauzin, Thierry Giardina

Abstract

Sucrose is the main form of assimilated carbon which is produced during photosynthesis and then transported from source to sink tissues via the phloem. This disaccharide is known to have important roles as signaling molecule and it is involved in many metabolic processes in plants. Essential for plant growth and development, sucrose is engaged in plant defense by activating plant immune responses against pathogens. During infection, pathogens reallocate the plant sugars for their own needs forcing the plants to modify their sugar content and triggering their defense responses. Among enzymes that hydrolyze sucrose and alter carbohydrate partitioning, invertases have been reported to be affected during plant-pathogen interactions. Recent highlights on the role of invertases in the establishment of plant defense responses suggest a more complex regulation of sugar signaling in plant-pathogen interaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 332 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 21%
Researcher 53 16%
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 72 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 162 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 18%
Environmental Science 11 3%
Chemistry 4 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 81 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,819
of 24,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,935
of 243,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#41
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.