↓ Skip to main content

The low energy signaling network

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The low energy signaling network
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filipa Tomé, Thomas Nägele, Mattia Adamo, Abhroop Garg, Carles Marco-llorca, Ella Nukarinen, Lorenzo Pedrotti, Alessia Peviani, Andrea Simeunovic, Anna Tatkiewicz, Monika Tomar, Magdalena Gamm

Abstract

Stress impacts negatively on plant growth and crop productivity, caicultural production worldwide. Throughout their life, plants are often confronted with multiple types of stress that affect overall cellular energy status and activate energy-saving responses. The resulting low energy syndrome (LES) includes transcriptional, translational, and metabolic reprogramming and is essential for stress adaptation. The conserved kinases sucrose-non-fermenting-1-related protein kinase-1 (SnRK1) and target of rapamycin (TOR) play central roles in the regulation of LES in response to stress conditions, affecting cellular processes and leading to growth arrest and metabolic reprogramming. We review the current understanding of how TOR and SnRK1 are involved in regulating the response of plants to low energy conditions. The central role in the regulation of cellular processes, the reprogramming of metabolism, and the phenotypic consequences of these two kinases will be discussed in light of current knowledge and potential future developments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 178 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 26%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 30 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,526
of 24,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,866
of 227,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#95
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.