↓ Skip to main content

Biological significance of complex N-glycans in plants and their impact on plant physiology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological significance of complex N-glycans in plants and their impact on plant physiology
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00363
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Strasser

Abstract

Asparagine (N)-linked protein glycosylation is a ubiquitous co- and post-translational modification which can alter the biological function of proteins and consequently affects the development, growth, and physiology of organisms. Despite an increasing knowledge of N-glycan biosynthesis and processing, we still understand very little about the biological function of individual N-glycan structures in plants. In particular, the N-glycan-processing steps mediated by Golgi-resident enzymes create a structurally diverse set of protein-linked carbohydrate structures. Some of these complex N-glycan modifications like the presence of β1,2-xylose, core α1,3-fucose or the Lewis a-epitope are characteristic for plants and are evolutionary highly conserved. In mammals, complex N-glycans are involved in different cellular processes including molecular recognition and signaling events. In contrast, the complex N-glycan function is still largely unknown in plants. Here, in this short review, I focus on important recent developments and discuss their implications for future research in plant glycobiology and plant biotechnology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 26%
Chemistry 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,233,066
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,960
of 20,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,434
of 228,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#117
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.