↓ Skip to main content

To respond or not to respond, the recurring question in plant mechanosensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To respond or not to respond, the recurring question in plant mechanosensitivity
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathalie Leblanc-Fournier, Ludovic Martin, Catherine Lenne, Mélanie Decourteix

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 29%
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Philosophy 2 3%
Materials Science 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,537,234
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,597
of 20,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,303
of 232,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#122
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.