↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Na+ fluxes in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulation of Na+ fluxes in plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00467
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frans J M Maathuis, Izhar Ahmad, Juan Patishtan

Abstract

When exposed to salt, every plant takes up Na(+) from the environment. Once in the symplast, Na(+) is distributed within cells and between different tissues and organs. There it can help to lower the cellular water potential but also exert potentially toxic effects. Control of Na(+) fluxes is therefore crucial and indeed, research shows that the divergence between salt tolerant and salt sensitive plants is not due to a variation in transporter types but rather originates in the control of uptake and internal Na(+) fluxes. A number of regulatory mechanisms has been identified based on signaling of Ca(2+), cyclic nucleotides, reactive oxygen species, hormones, or on transcriptional and post translational changes of gene and protein expression. This review will give an overview of intra- and intercellular movement of Na(+) in plants and will summarize our current ideas of how these fluxes are controlled and regulated in the early stages of salt stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 26%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 14%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 57 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,261,875
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,672
of 20,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,655
of 226,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.