↓ Skip to main content

A Vavilovian approach to discovering crop-associated microbes with potential to enhance plant immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Vavilovian approach to discovering crop-associated microbes with potential to enhance plant immunity
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iago L. Hale, Kirk Broders, Gloria Iriarte

Abstract

Through active associations with a diverse community of largely non-pathogenic microbes, a plant may be thought of as possessing an "extended genotype," an interactive cross-organismal genome with potential, exploitable implications for plant immunity. The successful enrichment of plant microbiomes with beneficial species has led to numerous commercial applications, and the hunt for new biocontrol organisms continues. Increasingly flexible and affordable sequencing technologies, supported by increasingly comprehensive taxonomic databases, make the characterization of non-model crop-associated microbiomes a widely accessible research method toward this end; and such studies are becoming more frequent. A summary of this emerging literature reveals, however, the need for a more systematic research lens in the face of what is already a metagenomics data deluge. Considering the processes and consequences of crop evolution and domestication, we assert that the judicious integration of in situ crop wild relatives into phytobiome research efforts presents a singularly powerful tool for separating signal from noise, thereby facilitating a more efficient means of identifying candidate plant-associated microbes with the potential for enhancing the immunity and fitness of crop species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Brazil 3 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 82 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 31%
Researcher 21 22%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 76%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,302,411
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,240
of 24,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,312
of 260,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#37
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.