↓ Skip to main content

An update on source-to-sink carbon partitioning in tomato

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An update on source-to-sink carbon partitioning in tomato
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia Osorio, Yong-Ling Ruan, Alisdair R. Fernie

Abstract

Plant growth and carbon metabolism are closely associated since carbohydrate in the form of sucrose generated by photosynthesis, provides the primary source of building blocks and energy for the production and maintenance of biomass. Regulation of carbon partitioning between source and sink tissues is important because it has a vast influence on both plant growth and development. The regulation of carbon partitioning at the whole plant level is directly linked to the cellular pathways of assimilate transport and the metabolism and allocation of sugars, mainly sucrose and hexoses in source leaves, and sink organs such as roots and fruit. By using tomato plant as a model, this review documents and discusses our current understanding of source-sink interactions from molecular to physiological perspectives focusing on those that regulate the growth and development of both vegetative and reproductive organs. It furthermore discusses the impact that environmental conditions play in maintenance of this balance in an attempt to address the link between physiological and ecological aspects of growth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 293 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 23%
Researcher 45 15%
Student > Master 39 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 71 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 7%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Environmental Science 3 <1%
Engineering 3 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 82 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,948,255
of 24,149,630 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,370
of 22,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,341
of 259,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#126
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,149,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.