↓ Skip to main content

Disorder and function: a review of the dehydrin protein family

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disorder and function: a review of the dehydrin protein family
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen P. Graether, Kelly F. Boddington

Abstract

Dehydration proteins (dehydrins) are group 2 members of the late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) protein family. The protein architecture of dehydrins can be described by the presence of three types of conserved sequence motifs that have been named the K-, Y-, and S-segments. By definition, a dehydrin must contain at least one copy of the lysine-rich K-segment. Abiotic stresses such as drought, cold, and salinity cause the upregulation of dehydrin mRNA and protein levels. Despite the large body of genetic and protein evidence of the importance of these proteins in stress response, the in vivo protective mechanism is not fully known. In vitro experimental evidence from biochemical assays and localization experiments suggests multiple roles for dehydrins, including membrane protection, cryoprotection of enzymes, and protection from reactive oxygen species. Membrane binding by dehydrins is likely to be as a peripheral membrane protein, since the protein sequences are highly hydrophilic and contain many charged amino acids. Because of this, dehydrins in solution are intrinsically disordered proteins, that is, they have no well-defined secondary or tertiary structure. Despite their disorder, dehydrins have been shown to gain structure when bound to ligands such as membranes, and to possibly change their oligomeric state when bound to ions. We review what is currently known about dehydrin sequences and their structures, and examine the various ligands that have been shown to bind to this family of proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 221 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Master 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 49 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 22%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Unspecified 3 1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 58 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,781,227
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,887
of 20,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,992
of 260,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#41
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,065 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.