You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carbohydrates in plant immunity and plant protection: roles and potential application as foliar sprays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2014.00592 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Trouvelot, Marie-Claire Héloir, Benoît Poinssot, Adrien Gauthier, Franck Paris, Christelle Guillier, Maud Combier, Lucie Trdá, Xavier Daire, Marielle Adrian |
| Abstract |
Increasing interest is devoted to carbohydrates for their roles in plant immunity. Some of them are elicitors of plant defenses whereas other ones act as signaling molecules in a manner similar to phytohormones. This review first describes the main classes of carbohydrates associated to plant immunity, their role and mode of action. More precisely, the state of the art about perception of "PAMP, MAMP, and DAMP (Pathogen-, Microbe-, Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns) type" oligosaccharides is presented and examples of induced defense events are provided. A particular attention is paid to the structure/activity relationships of these compounds. The role of sugars as signaling molecules, especially in plant microbe interactions, is also presented. Secondly, the potentialities and limits of foliar sprays of carbohydrates to stimulate plant immunity for crop protection against diseases are discussed, with focus on the roles of the leaf cuticle and phyllosphere microflora. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 446 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 14% |
| Researcher | 57 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 13% |
| Unknown | 121 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 204 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 23 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 4% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Unknown | 132 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,054,938
of 24,255,619 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,092
of 22,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,723
of 267,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#21
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,255,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,737 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.