↓ Skip to main content

Making sense of hormone-mediated defense networking: from rice to Arabidopsis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making sense of hormone-mediated defense networking: from rice to Arabidopsis
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00611
Pubmed ID
Authors

David De Vleesschauwer, Jing Xu, Monica Höfte

Abstract

Phytohormones are not only essential for plant growth and development but also play central roles in triggering the plant immune signaling network. Historically, research aimed at elucidating the defense-associated role of hormones has tended to focus on the use of experimentally tractable dicot plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana. Emerging from these studies is a picture whereby complex crosstalk and induced hormonal changes mold plant health and disease, with outcomes largely dependent on the lifestyle and infection strategy of invading pathogens. However, recent studies in monocot plants are starting to provide additional important insights into the immune-regulatory roles of hormones, often revealing unique complexities. In this review, we address the latest discoveries dealing with hormone-mediated immunity in rice, one of the most important food crops and an excellent model for molecular genetic studies in monocots. Moreover, we highlight interactions between hormone signaling, rice defense and pathogen virulence, and discuss the differences and similarities with findings in Arabidopsis. Finally, we present a model for hormone defense networking in rice and describe how detailed knowledge of hormone crosstalk mechanisms can be used for engineering durable rice disease resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 255 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 27%
Researcher 50 19%
Student > Master 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 140 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 18%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 52 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,390,152
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,676
of 20,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,404
of 258,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#55
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,063 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.