↓ Skip to main content

Multicellularity in green algae: upsizing in a walled complex

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multicellularity in green algae: upsizing in a walled complex
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00649
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S Domozych, Catherine E Domozych

Abstract

Modern green algae constitute a large and diverse taxonomic assemblage that encompasses many multicellular phenotypes including colonial, filamentous, and parenchymatous forms. In all multicellular green algae, each cell is surrounded by an extracellular matrix (ECM), most often in the form of a cell wall. Volvocalean taxa like Volvox have an elaborate, gel-like, hydroxyproline rich glycoprotein covering that contains the cells of the colony. In "ulvophytes," uronic acid-rich and sulfated polysaccharides are the likely adhesion agents that maintain the multicellular habit. Charophytes also produce polysaccharide-rich cell walls and in late divergent taxa, pectin plays a critical role in cell adhesion in the multicellular complex. Cell walls are products of coordinated interaction of membrane trafficking, cytoskeletal dynamics and the cell's signal transduction machinery responding both to precise internal clocks and external environmental cues. Most often, these activities must be synchronized with the secretion, deposition and remodeling of the polymers of the ECM. Rapid advances in molecular genetics, cell biology and cell wall biochemistry of green algae will soon provide new insights into the evolution and subcellular processes leading to multicellularity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Hungary 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 21%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,731,702
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,947
of 20,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,077
of 362,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#126
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,065 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.