↓ Skip to main content

Peptides and small molecules of the plant-pathogen apoplastic arena

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peptides and small molecules of the plant-pathogen apoplastic arena
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00677
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Adam Mott, Maggie A. Middleton, Darrell Desveaux, David S. Guttman

Abstract

Plants reside within an environment rich in potential pathogens. Survival in the presence of such threats requires both effective perception of, and appropriate responses to, pathogenic attack. While plants lack an adaptive immune system, they have a highly developed and responsive innate immune system able to detect and inhibit the growth of the vast majority of potential pathogens. Many of the critical interactions that characterize the relationship between plants and pathogens are played out in the intercellular apoplastic space. The initial perception of pathogen invasion is often achieved through specific plant receptor-like kinases that recognize conserved molecular patterns presented by the pathogen or respond to the molecular debris caused by cellular damage. The perception of either microbial or damage signals by these receptors initiates a response that includes the production of peptides and small molecules to enhance cellular integrity and inhibit pathogen growth. In this review, we discuss the roles of apoplastic peptides and small molecules in modulating plant-pathogen interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Chemistry 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,328
of 24,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,426
of 369,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#43
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.