↓ Skip to main content

Biophysical and biochemical constraints imposed by salt stress: learning from halophytes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biophysical and biochemical constraints imposed by salt stress: learning from halophytes
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00746
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernardo Duarte, Noomene Sleimi, Isabel Caçador

Abstract

Soil salinization is one of the most important factors impacting plant productivity. About 3.6 billion of the world's 5.2 billion ha of agricultural dry land, have already suffered erosion, degradation, and salinization. Halophytes are typically considered as plants able to complete their life cycle in environments where the salt concentration is above 200 mM NaCl. Salinity adjustment is a complex phenomenon but essential mechanism to overcome salt stress, with both biophysical and biochemical implications. At this level, halophytes evolved in several directions, adopting different strategies. Otherwise, the lack of adaptation to a salt environment would negatively affect their electron transduction pathways and the entire energetic metabolism, the foundation of every plant photosynthesis and biomass production. The maintenance of ionic homeostasis is in the basis of all cellular counteractive measures, in particular in terms of redox potential and energy transduction. In the present work the biophysical mechanisms underlying energy capture and transduction in halophytes are discussed alongside with their relation with biochemical counteractive mechanisms, integrating data from photosynthetic light harvesting complexes, electron transport chains to the quinone pools, carbon fixation, and energy dissipation metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 47%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Unspecified 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,247,117
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,969
of 20,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,781
of 353,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#159
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.