↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00770
Pubmed ID
Authors

Astrid Junker, Moses M. Muraya, Kathleen Weigelt-Fischer, Fernando Arana-Ceballos, Christian Klukas, Albrecht E. Melchinger, Rhonda C. Meyer, David Riewe, Thomas Altmann

Abstract

Detailed and standardized protocols for plant cultivation in environmentally controlled conditions are an essential prerequisite to conduct reproducible experiments with precisely defined treatments. Setting up appropriate and well defined experimental procedures is thus crucial for the generation of solid evidence and indispensable for successful plant research. Non-invasive and high throughput (HT) phenotyping technologies offer the opportunity to monitor and quantify performance dynamics of several hundreds of plants at a time. Compared to small scale plant cultivations, HT systems have much higher demands, from a conceptual and a logistic point of view, on experimental design, as well as the actual plant cultivation conditions, and the image analysis and statistical methods for data evaluation. Furthermore, cultivation conditions need to be designed that elicit plant performance characteristics corresponding to those under natural conditions. This manuscript describes critical steps in the optimization of procedures for HT plant phenotyping systems. Starting with the model plant Arabidopsis, HT-compatible methods were tested, and optimized with regard to growth substrate, soil coverage, watering regime, experimental design (considering environmental inhomogeneities) in automated plant cultivation and imaging systems. As revealed by metabolite profiling, plant movement did not affect the plants' physiological status. Based on these results, procedures for maize HT cultivation and monitoring were established. Variation of maize vegetative growth in the HT phenotyping system did match well with that observed in the field. The presented results outline important issues to be considered in the design of HT phenotyping experiments for model and crop plants. It thereby provides guidelines for the setup of HT experimental procedures, which are required for the generation of reliable and reproducible data of phenotypic variation for a broad range of applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 221 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 30%
Researcher 44 19%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 40 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Engineering 9 4%
Computer Science 6 3%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 56 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,616,549
of 23,396,451 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,508
of 21,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,720
of 355,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#84
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,396,451 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.