↓ Skip to main content

Some things get better with age: differences in salicylic acid accumulation and defense signaling in young and mature Arabidopsis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Some things get better with age: differences in salicylic acid accumulation and defense signaling in young and mature Arabidopsis
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Carella, Daniel C Wilson, Robin K Cameron

Abstract

In Arabidopsis, much of what we know about the phytohormone salicylic acid (SA) and its role in plant defense comes from experiments using young plants. We are interested in understanding why young plants are susceptible to virulent strains of Pseudomonas syringae, while mature plants exhibit a robust defense response known as age-related resistance (ARR). SA-mediated signaling is important for defense in young plants, however, ARR occurs independently of the defense regulators NPR1 and WHY1. Furthermore, intercellular SA accumulation is an important component of ARR, and intercellular washing fluids from ARR-competent plants exhibit antibacterial activity, suggesting that SA acts as an antimicrobial agent in the intercellular space. Young plants accumulate both intracellular and intercellular SA during PAMP- and effector-triggered immunity, however, virulent P. syringae promotes susceptibility by suppressing SA accumulation using the phytotoxin coronatine. Here we outline the hypothesis that mature, ARR-competent Arabidopsis alleviates coronatine-mediated suppression of SA accumulation. We also explore the role of SA in other mature-plant processes such as flowering and senescence, and discuss their potential impact on ARR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 20%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#10,994
of 24,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,749
of 358,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#103
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.