↓ Skip to main content

Reconstruction of fire regimes through integrated paleoecological proxy data and ecological modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstruction of fire regimes through integrated paleoecological proxy data and ecological modeling
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Iglesias, Gabriel I. Yospin, Cathy Whitlock

Abstract

Fire is a key ecological process affecting vegetation dynamics and land cover. The characteristic frequency, size, and intensity of fire are driven by interactions between top-down climate-driven and bottom-up fuel-related processes. Disentangling climatic from non-climatic drivers of past fire regimes is a grand challenge in Earth systems science, and a topic where both paleoecology and ecological modeling have made substantial contributions. In this manuscript, we (1) review the use of sedimentary charcoal as a fire proxy and the methods used in charcoal-based fire history reconstructions; (2) identify existing techniques for paleoecological modeling; and (3) evaluate opportunities for coupling of paleoecological and ecological modeling approaches to better understand the causes and consequences of past, present, and future fire activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 33 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 39 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,276,402
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,477
of 20,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,282
of 351,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#34
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.