You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
To die or not to die? Lessons from lesion mimic mutants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Quentin Bruggeman, Cécile Raynaud, Moussa Benhamed, Marianne Delarue |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 24% |
| Researcher | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2015.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,812
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,566
of 364,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#161
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.