↓ Skip to main content

Toward a more physiologically and evolutionarily relevant definition of metal hyperaccumulation in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward a more physiologically and evolutionarily relevant definition of metal hyperaccumulation in plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric W. Goolsby, Chase M. Mason

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Croatia 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Professor 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 48%
Environmental Science 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,207,328
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,435
of 20,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,656
of 353,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#48
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.