You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sue E. Hartley, Rob N. Fitt, Emma L. McLarnon, Ruth N. Wade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,514,576
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,236
of 21,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,179
of 360,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#67
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.