↓ Skip to main content

Integration of metabolomics data into metabolic networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration of metabolomics data into metabolic networks
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Töpfer, Sabrina Kleessen, Zoran Nikoloski

Abstract

Metabolite levels together with their corresponding metabolic fluxes are integrative outcomes of biochemical transformations and regulatory processes and they can be used to characterize the response of biological systems to genetic and/or environmental changes. However, while changes in transcript or to some extent protein levels can usually be traced back to one or several responsible genes, changes in fluxes and particularly changes in metabolite levels do not follow such rationale and are often the outcome of complex interactions of several components. The increasing quality and coverage of metabolomics technologies have fostered the development of computational approaches for integrating metabolic read-outs with large-scale models to predict the physiological state of a system. Constraint-based approaches, relying on the stoichiometry of the considered reactions, provide a modeling framework amenable to analyses of large-scale systems and to the integration of high-throughput data. Here we review the existing approaches that integrate metabolomics data in variants of constrained-based approaches to refine model reconstructions, to constrain flux predictions in metabolic models, and to relate network structural properties to metabolite levels. Finally, we discuss the challenges and perspectives in the developments of constraint-based modeling approaches driven by metabolomics data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 243 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 22%
Researcher 48 19%
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 22%
Engineering 24 9%
Computer Science 18 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 38 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2015.
All research outputs
#13,936,629
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,258
of 20,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,160
of 255,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#79
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,075 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.