You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Target or barrier? The cell wall of early- and later-diverging plants vs cadmium toxicity: differences in the response mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00133 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luigi Parrotta, Gea Guerriero, Kjell Sergeant, Giampiero Cai, Jean-Francois Hausman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 20% |
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 50 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,991
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,511
of 365,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#84
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.