↓ Skip to main content

Jacks of metal/metalloid chelation trade in plants—an overview

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Jacks of metal/metalloid chelation trade in plants—an overview
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naser A. Anjum, Mirza Hasanuzzaman, Mohammad A. Hossain, Palaniswamy Thangavel, Aryadeep Roychoudhury, Sarvajeet S. Gill, Miguel A. Merlos Rodrigo, Vojtěch Adam, Masayuki Fujita, Rene Kizek, Armando C. Duarte, Eduarda Pereira, Iqbal Ahmad

Abstract

Varied environmental compartments including soils are being contaminated by a myriad toxic metal(loid)s (hereafter termed as "metal/s") mainly through anthropogenic activities. These metals may contaminate food chain and bring irreparable consequences in human. Plant-based approach (phytoremediation) stands second to none among bioremediation technologies meant for sustainable cleanup of soils/sites with metal-contamination. In turn, the capacity of plants to tolerate potential consequences caused by the extracted/accumulated metals decides the effectiveness and success of phytoremediation system. Chelation is among the potential mechanisms that largely govern metal-tolerance in plant cells by maintaining low concentrations of free metals in cytoplasm. Metal-chelation can be performed by compounds of both thiol origin (such as GSH, glutathione; PCs, phytochelatins; MTs, metallothioneins) and non-thiol origin (such as histidine, nicotianamine, organic acids). This paper presents an appraisal of recent reports on both thiol and non-thiol compounds in an effort to shed light on the significance of these compounds in plant-metal tolerance, as well as to provide scientific clues for the advancement of metal-phytoextraction strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 173 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 23%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 42 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 11%
Environmental Science 13 7%
Chemistry 5 3%
Materials Science 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 58 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#13,901,936
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,009
of 21,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,052
of 264,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#77
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.