↓ Skip to main content

Effects of environmental factors and management practices on microclimate, winter physiology, and frost resistance in trees

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of environmental factors and management practices on microclimate, winter physiology, and frost resistance in trees
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Charrier, Jérôme Ngao, Marc Saudreau, Thierry Améglio

Abstract

Freezing stress is one of the most important limiting factors determining the ecological distribution and production of tree species. Assessment of frost risk is, therefore, critical for forestry, fruit production, and horticulture. Frost risk is substantial when hazard (i.e., exposure to damaging freezing temperatures) intersects with vulnerability (i.e., frost sensitivity). Based on a large number of studies on frost resistance and frost occurrence, we highlight the complex interactive roles of environmental conditions, carbohydrates, and water status in frost risk development. To supersede the classical empirical relations used to model frost hardiness, we propose an integrated ecophysiologically-based framework of frost risk assessment. This framework details the individual or interactive roles of these factors, and how they are distributed in time and space at the individual-tree level (within-crown and across organs). Based on this general framework, we are able to highlight factors by which different environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, light, flood, and drought), and management practices (pruning, thinning, girdling, sheltering, water aspersion, irrigation, and fertilization) influence frost sensitivity and frost exposure of trees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 21%
Researcher 39 18%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 49 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 44%
Environmental Science 39 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 62 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,875,765
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,415
of 20,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,958
of 264,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#12
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,080 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.