↓ Skip to main content

NAC-MYB-based transcriptional regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in land plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
356 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NAC-MYB-based transcriptional regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in land plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshimi Nakano, Masatoshi Yamaguchi, Hitoshi Endo, Nur Ardiyana Rejab, Misato Ohtani

Abstract

Plant cells biosynthesize primary cell walls (PCW) in all cells and produce secondary cell walls (SCWs) in specific cell types that conduct water and/or provide mechanical support, such as xylem vessels and fibers. The characteristic mechanical stiffness, chemical recalcitrance, and hydrophobic nature of SCWs result from the organization of SCW-specific biopolymers, i.e., highly ordered cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Synthesis of these SCW-specific biopolymers requires SCW-specific enzymes that are regulated by SCW-specific transcription factors. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of the transcriptional regulation of SCW formation in plant cells. Advances in research on SCW biosynthesis during the past decade have expanded our understanding of the transcriptional regulation of SCW formation, particularly the functions of the NAC and MYB transcription factors. Focusing on the NAC-MYB-based transcriptional network, we discuss the regulatory systems that evolved in land plants to modify the cell wall to serve as a key component of structures that conduct water and provide mechanical support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 284 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 25%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 73 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 124 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 24%
Materials Science 6 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Environmental Science 2 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 75 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,810,408
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,214
of 20,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,978
of 264,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#115
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,080 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.